A floating bench. A mirror that cracks the light. Only two objects, and yet an entire universe: that ofImmaterial, the unexpected meeting between Jacques Cartier, an independent project led by the artist Willy Cartier, and Western, a Norwegian manufacturer of street furniture committed to sustainability.
These creations seem to defy the usual categories of design. Neither seasonal furniture nor a stamped collection, they embody a creative interlude, a free gesture that escapes calendars and marketing strategies.

Jacques Cartier, the project
Jacques Cartier is not a classic design house but a independent project, fluid, elusive. Going against the grain of industrial logic, it asserts itself as a space for creation off-market : no regular collections, no calendar, no style strategy. Each piece is born from an impulse, an encounter, or an intuition.
This project rejects categories—art, fashion, crafts, design—in order to better explore them all at once. Its objects carry within them a measure of instinct: a sculpture can become a piece of furniture, a gesture can transform into a functional silhouette. Jacques Cartier asserts a radical freedom that makes it a creative laboratory apart, always on the margins, always shifting.
Willy Cartier, the artist
Behind Jacques Cartier, there is Willy Cartier, a unique figure on the contemporary scene. Son of the painter Georges de Patricia and a dancer of Vietnamese and Senegalese origin, Willy grew up in an artistic universe that nourished his vision and his body. Trained in dance and theater, he first established himself as a model, collaborating with Givenchy, Chanel and Jean-Paul Gaultier, before exploring cinema and performance.
But Willy Cartier never accepted boundaries. His hybrid career reflects a desire to remain elusive, to inhabit several creative territories simultaneously. With Jacques Cartier, he extends this rejection of labels: each object is for him an extension of the gesture, a way of giving substance to an inner energy.
His approach is intuitive, almost instinctive: a drawing, a movement, a material are enough to trigger the birth of a piece. With Immaterial, its bench and its mirror become more than furniture: they are freedom manifestos, sensitive experiences that invite a different relationship with space.

Vestre, Scandinavian heritage in motion
Founded in 1947, Western is a Norwegian company with a clear mission: to manufacture sustainable street furniture, designed for sharing and conviviality. Public benches, tables, collective installations... Its creations are distinguished by a typically Scandinavian formal sobriety and a rigorous environmental commitment: European production, short supply chains, responsible materials.
But behind this rigor also hides a curiosity. Vestre devotes 10% of its production to non-standard projects, unexpected collaborations that open up new perspectives. With Jacques Cartier, the house leaves the public space to invest in a more sensitive, almost poetic terrain.
In Immaterial, the mirror she co-authored is erected like a vertical fault. It captures light, distorts it, and reflects it, questioning self-image and the surrounding space. Where Vestre usually creates furniture to be inhabited collectively, this mirror speaks to the individual, to their intimate relationship with matter and reflection.
When gesture and rigor intertwine
Immaterial is born from this improbable dialogue between two languages: that of the free, impulsive, almost instinctive gesture, and that of sustainable, calibrated, controlled industry. From this tension is born a balance: a bench that floats between sky and ground, a mirror that cracks space.
These objects do not seek to furnish, but to transform the way we liveThey are less products than experiences, invitations to think differently, to look differently.
A shared freedom
For Willy Cartier, this collaboration marks a further step in a trajectory that has always been on the margins, rejecting established categories. For Vestre, it confirms that an industrial player can open up to the unexpected, to the experimental, without abandoning its commitments.
Immaterial isn't a collection. It's a parenthesis. A breath of freedom that, in the span of two pieces, brings together two worlds that are both opposite and connected in every way.
A signal for contemporary design
This collaboration is part of a broader movement in which contemporary design seeks to move beyond mere functionality to embrace the realm of experience. By bringing together an industrial house and a multidisciplinary artist, this collaboration illustrates several trends:
- The dissolution of the boundaries between art and design. The bench and mirror are not conceived as utilitarian objects, but as poetic devices. They shift the function towards contemplation, recalling the approaches of designer-artists like Ron Arad or Nacho Carbonell.
- The promotion of experimental gestures within industry. By dedicating a portion of its production to unplanned projects, Vestre recognizes the importance of experimentation as a driver of innovation. This approach contrasts with traditional industrial logic, which is often focused on optimization and reproducibility.
- Highlighting sustainability as a field of exploration. Here, Vestre's Scandinavian rigor is not limited to ecology; it becomes a framework within which an artist's formal freedom can emerge. Sustainability is no longer a constraint, but a platform.
- An implicit critique of the temporality of the market. By rejecting seasonality, Immaterial opposes the pace of fashion and commercial design. It proposes a different temporality, that of the pure creative moment.
Less a collaboration than a discreet manifesto: these objects suggest that contemporary design can be thought of as a space of resistance to market logic, a place where industry and art come together to create meaningful objects. This collection could well mark more than a one-off encounter: it traces a horizon. At a time when design is often torn between the demand for sustainability, the speed of trends, and market pressure, this collaboration offers another path: that of coexistence between freedom and rigor.
In the coming years, we can imagine that more and more industrial players will seek to open their processes to external creators, not to produce "premium" limited series, but to reinject experimentation into their DNA. Design could thus move closer to art not for stylistic reasons, but out of necessity: to restore meaning, to slow down, to reconnect with experience.
Similarly, independent artists like Willy Cartier could find in these collaborations an opportunity to anchor their intuitions in technical and sustainable know-how, without losing their singularity. This hybridization would open the way to intangible and timeless objects, who question more than they answer, who accompany more than they serve.
Immaterial then becomes a still isolated but powerful signal: that of a design which is no longer content to furnish the world, but which questions it, transforms it and invites us to inhabit it differently.
Ema Lynnx






























